August 10, 2016

Advanced Bionutritionals

You don’t ever hear about them…

Operating just outside the circle of the mainstream, a small group of maverick doctors are quietly curing people of cancer.

…An oncologist discovered a way to naturally turn off cancer-causing genes.

…One doctor said his protocol had a 100% cure rate for advanced pancreatic cancer.

…Another doctor’s treatment kills breast cancer cells in only 3 days.

But once news about these therapies finally started getting some buzz, something shocking happened.

These doctors died under mysterious circumstances. (EXTREMELY mysterious, as you’re about to see.) And they weren’t the only ones…

All told, 15 natural health doctors died or disappeared within a recent four-month period.

That’s why we kicked off an independent investigation when this situation began to unfold last June.

Today we’re sharing with you the stunning evidence we uncovered. And more important, details on the groundbreaking cancer research these doctors were doing.

If you or a loved one have ever had cancer, or you’re worried about getting it, this video is a must-see. But I urge you to hurry. Due to its controversial nature, I don’t know how long it will stay online.


Chemotherapy Drugs Cause More Cancer

Very powerful video.

Alzheimer’s was eradicated 19 years ago...

YES. It has been eradicated by some crazy scientists about 19 years ago... but BIG PHARMA couldn’t let that happen.

Few people know that Marc L., a very passionate scientist, dedicated his life to curing Alzheimer's… and when he finally did that... so that no one should suffer from it ever again... his family found him dead.

The bad news is that his work has been buried for more than 19 years… and, in the mean time, millions of people have suffered from this terrible disease.

The good news is that another man took his work forward and managed to discover a method called by the people who used it the "Alzheimer's killer".

This guy doesn't want to say a word about the scientist who eradicated Alzheimer's disease over 19 years ago. Probably he's just afraid for his life...

Anyway, one thing is clear... 43,433 people have watched his video so far and voted this as #1 option to go to if someone they know suffers from memory loss.

Another piece of bad news is that this video won't be up for long... so if you want to see what has been kept hidden from your eyes for the past 19 years.


Stopping the Cure: Why Cancer Research isn’t Focused On the True Cause of Cancer By Tony Isaacs

Great article from www, about why Cancer Research isn’t Focused On the True Cause of Cancer.

Since the war on cancer was declared half a century ago, hundreds of billions of dollars have been poured into cancer research. However, despite annual pronouncements of cures and breakthroughs that are just around the corner, all that research has failed to keep the incidence of cancer from continuing to increase. Most of the small reductions in cancer deaths are due mostly to earlier detection which increases five year survival rates – the yardstick conventional medicine uses to determine success.

There is a very good explanation for why cancer research has failed so badly…

It has been directed away from the true main cause of most cancer – toxins. In early years, such misdirection could be partially explained by the lack of understanding about the nature and causes of cancer. In recent decades, however, cancer research has been directed away from toxins even as the evidence has mounted that toxins are indeed the primary cause of cancer. The reasons for misdirecting cancer research are two-fold:

Covering up the culpability of those who produce toxins and sell toxic products
Greed on the part of mainstream medicine and others who profit from cancer
As an example of the way cancer causes are covered up and the greed that drives the cancer industry, consider the marketing of “pink.” Many of the companies who are part of the hugely publicized Breast Cancer Awareness Movement (BCAM) sell pink-themed products which contain cancer causing toxins.

The Great Pink “Cancer Cover-Up”

There has been a huge effort for many decades to direct attention away from toxins. If toxins were recognized as primary causers of cancer, this would focus attention on the industries which produce toxins as well as the companies whose products contain toxins.

Consequently, many of those who cause cancer have joined together to direct research away from toxins and towards such outdated areas as genetic cancer causes. To make sure they keep the spotlight off toxins, cancer-causing companies have endeavored to place representatives in key positions in both government agencies and non-profit organizations. Such agencies and organizations include the National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society (ACS), and the Breast Cancer Awareness Movement.

The evidence is overwhelming that the primary cause of cancer is environmental, and thus preventable. Yet the National Cancer Institute refuses to acknowledge toxins as a major cause. It consistently understated the connection, maintaining that only 6% of all cancer cases stem from environmental and occupational carcinogens.

In 2010, the President’s Cancer Panel provided strong confirmation that exposure to toxic chemicals is an important and under-recognized risk factor for cancer. Right on cue, the industry-influenced American Cancer Society attempted to refute the panel’s conclusions. Both the NCI and the American Cancer Society, like other cancer agencies and organizations, continue to cling to the outdated and disputed theory that genetics are the main cause of cancer.

As Naturopathic Doctor Loretta Lanphier reported in “Genetic Cancer Theory Disproven Yet Continues to be Propagated,” a succession of scientific findings beginning with studies conducted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries led scientists to suggest that cancer is genetic and is caused by a sequence of DNA mutations in the gene. Coupled with this research was the discovery of the oncogene by Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT’s) Dr. Robert A. Weinberg. The well reported nature of these findings began the spark of the widespread belief that cancer is in fact genetic, which continues to this day.

Dr. Lanphier also reported, “As you may have not heard, Dr. Weinberg reversed his original theory twelve years ago after discovering that less than one DNA base in a million appeared to have been miscopied, concluding that not enough defect existed to cause cell mutation. His exact words: ‘Something was very wrong. The notion that a cancer developed through the successive activation of a series of oncogenes had lost its link to reality.’

More recently, in 2005, the directors of the world’s largest cancer research center in Houston, Texas, announced that cancer’s prime cause is not genetic. Despite the magnitude of these reports, they’ve been widely overlooked by the mainstream media.”

There is no greater example of the great cancer cover-up than the Breast Cancer Awareness Movement. BCAM was created by the Imperial Chemical Company, since bought out by AstraZeneca, which was recognized at the time of the inception of the BCAM as the second largest producers of carcinogens in the United States. Imperial Chemical was soon joined by chemical companies, cosmetic companies, food companies, and others whose products caused or contained cancer-causing toxins. BCAM has endeavored to keep the focus off toxins since the very beginning, including directing research almost solely towards genetics.


How Greed Drives the Cancer Industry

The cancer industry has grown to be a financial Goliath worth hundreds of billions of dollars in profits each year. Included in this industry, of course, are all the doctors, nurses, hospitals, labs, technicians, hospices, chemotherapy drug makers, and X-Ray machine and film makers. But the cancer industry also includes huge salaries, perks, and other expenses in numerous government agencies and non-profit organizations. The inescapable reality is that all those profits, salaries, and perks can only be maintained, much less increased, if we do NOT find a cure for cancer.

Non-Biased Cancer Research and Prevention Organizations

Although they receive a small pittance compared to the money spent on mainstream cancer research, there are cancer organizations out there who appear to be independent of ulterior influences and are working to actually make a difference. A partial list includes:

The Independent Cancer Research Foundation
The Annie Appleseed Project
The Cancer Prevention Coalition
The Breast Cancer Fund

When you look at how cancer research continues to be misdirected to this very day – despite all the evidence about what really causes cancer – there is an obvious conclusion. The failure to direct efforts towards finding a cure for cancer has been deliberate. As with mainstream medicine in general, greed and profits are foremost and our health takes a distant second place. It does not appear that this will change any time soon, so those of us who care will just have to keep spreading the truth as far and wide as we can.

May 28, 2016

Why baking soda fights cancer

Why baking soda fights cancer?

There was an interesting discussion on the Advanced Bionutritionals Facebook page a couple weeks ago. If you’ve ever visited the page, you probably know about the great health tips posted there every week. One of them said, “Did you know that managing cancer with low doses of chemotherapy can be more effective than attempting to kill the disease in one massive attack? A new study shows promising results. Here’s what you need to know: CLICK HERE."

That link takes you to a great article by my friend and colleague Frank Shallenberger, MD. Well, one great response to the tip came from Dieter S. He wrote, “Drink a teaspoon of baking soda in a glass of clean water three times a day and cure most cancers in weeks.” We’ve known about baking soda’s ability to fight cancer for years. I first heard about it 20 years ago. So it’s nothing new. But the reason baking soda works is just now coming out.

For years, experts thought baking soda’s cancer-fighting ability came from its ability to alkalinize an acidic body. Many cancers thrive when the body has a pH that’s more acidic than alkaline, so this makes sense. But it’s not the only reason it works.

This came out when Jeanie D. responded to Dieter’s tip by asking, “Would that create a sodium imbalance?” Great question, Jeanie. The scientific name for baking soda is sodium bicarbonate. So it would make sense that the sodium might be too much for some people. However, sodium is an acid-neutralizer. In other words, if your pH is acidic, then you’re probably low on sodium already. Taking some sodium bicarbonate wouldn’t create an imbalance, it would fix it.

But there’s more to the sodium story than just pH.

It’s common to find low sodium blood levels in patients who have cancer and are undergoing cancer treatments. However, there’s some debate as to whether the cancer and its treatment causes the low levels of sodium or if the low levels of sodium caused the cancer.

We know that low sodium can lead to cancer, including lung cancer. So it’s quite possible that low sodium levels make you more susceptible to cancer. Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers today. Its occurrence is growing rapidly. Is it possible low sodium levels are to blame?

But regardless of whether the low sodium level caused the cancer or the other way around, it’s clear that fixing a low sodium condition can fight the cancer. This is one reason baking soda can have such a profound impact on cancer.

What’s concerning is that low blood sodium is common in older adults. It’s especially common for anyone who is hospitalized or living in a long-term care facility. So you need to stay on top of your sodium levels. Most adults should have a sodium blood level of 136-145 mEq/L. If it’s low, you’ll need to take steps to raise it. Most doctors will give you water pills or an IV to raise the levels.

If you have cancer and want to try baking soda, find a doctor familiar with its use and who can tell you how much you should use. If you don’t have cancer, but know you’re acidic, you can try one-half teaspoon of baking soda in your water. You can drink this every two hours, but don’t take more than seven doses in a day. If you’re over 60, keep the dose to three per day unless otherwise directed by your doctor.

PEMF Treatment

PEMF =  Pulsating Electro Magnetic Field

Advanced Injury Repair & Rapid Reduction of Inflammation

Over 25 years ago the FDA has approved PEMF for bone healing and depression.

When God made the world He made it to be held together by electromagnetic fields.

Our bodies are electromagnetic and every function is an electrical event, which starts in our brain and travels through our nervous system.  We have over 45 miles of nerves in our body.

Our bodies are like batteries, our cells have a measureable electrical gradient which is vital in their ability to repair an injury & fight off disease.  When our cells are adequately charged our cells can perform tasks like injury repair much quicker & with higher levels effectiveness.

How does our cells gradient energy become low?
Mineral levels are low due to nutritional deficiencies

Our bodies are DC current, and should be plugged into the earth.  AC current (lighting, laptops, cell phones, TV’s) is everywhere draining our DC current.

Our PEMF therapy will specifically target the compromised part of the body and significantly increase the electrical gradient of your cells thus considerably improving the cells ability to repair and heal.  PEMF is like a battery charger for the human cell.

Harold Saxson Burr PHD, while studying at the Yale University of Medicine, discovered that measurable imbalances in the electrical field of an organ precedes the onset of pathology. He also stated, “if the electrical imbalance is corrected, the disease does not manifest.”

Jerry Tenant MD wrote a book called “Healing is Voltage” In his book he explains that injured / damaged cells require 2x more energy to repair.

Another reason why PEMF is so effective at Advanced Injury Repair & Rapid Reduction of Inflammation is that not only does the electrical gradient of the cell radically increase, but the cell pulsation pumps out toxins.  As the cell detoxifies itself, it pumps fresh oxygen, fresh blood and lymphatic fluid into the cells of the injured / diseased area.

Because PEMF is utilizing a magnetic field it should NOT be used on or closed to any electrical devices. (i.e. pacemakers, defibrillators, cochlear hearing devices, cell phones)

PEMF – Does not move structure, therefore if you have a subluxation (pinched nerve) or other structural misalignment, Dr Donna can take care of that through natural chiropractic care.

PEMF – is NOT a medical device. It is an exercise machine for your body’s cells.

Medical Errors: A Hidden Killer

WebMD News from HealthDay By Robert Preidt HealthDay Reporter TUESDAY, May 3, 2016 (HealthDay News) --

Medical errors may be the third leading cause of death in the United States, a new study contends. Johns Hopkins University researchers analyzed eight years of U.S. data and concluded that more than 250,000 people died each year due to medical errors. If confirmed, that would make medical errors the third leading cause of death among Americans.

Currently, respiratory disease, which kills about 150,000 people a year, is listed as the third leading cause of death by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, "incidence rates for deaths directly attributable to medical care gone awry haven't been recognized in any standardized method for collecting national statistics," said Dr. Martin Makary, a professor of surgery at Baltimore-based Hopkins.

The CDC's data collection method does not classify medical errors separately on a death certificate, according to the study authors, who called for changes to that criteria. "The medical coding system was designed to maximize billing for physician services, not to collect national health statistics, as it is currently being used," Makary explained in a university news release.

The Hopkins researchers examined four separate studies that analyzed medical death rate data from 2000 to 2008, including two that used data from federal agencies. Then, using hospital admission rates from 2013, the investigators extrapolated that information, and based on a total of over 35 million hospitalizations, more than 251,000 deaths stemmed from a medical error. That translates to 9.5 percent of all U.S. deaths each year, the study authors said. But the CDC data paints a different picture.

The CDC statistics show that in 2013, over 611,000 people in the United States died of heart disease, nearly 585,000 died of cancer and about 150,000 died of chronic respiratory disease. "Top-ranked causes of death as reported by the CDC inform our country's research funding and public health priorities," Makary said. "Right now, cancer and heart disease get a ton of attention, but since medical errors don't appear on the list, the problem doesn't get the funding and attention it deserves." The findings were published May 3 in the BMJ.

May 10, 2016

Cure your own CANCER!!!

SCiO: Your Sixth Sense

New Israeli Cancer Vaccine Triggers Response In 90% Of Cancer Types

There’s no doubt that cancer is one of the world’s most vicious diseases. For decades, scientists have been trying to find a cure for cancer, a terminal illness that kills 8 million people worldwide every year. With 14 million new cancer cases diagnosed around the globe every year, according to the World Health Organization, the need for prevention is vital. Now, an Israeli biotechnology company is developing a vaccine for cancer, which is not designed to treat the disease – but to prevent it from returning.

Vaxil BioTherapeutics, based in Nes Ziona, Israel, has spent over half a decade developing ImMucin, a prophylactic cancer vaccine, which can trigger a response in about 90 percent of all types of cancer, according to the company.

“Vaxil is developing a drug to keep the cancer from coming back,” Julian Levy, Vaxil’s CFO, tells “We are trying to harness the natural power of the immune system to fight against cancer by seeking out cancer cells and destroying them.”

Levy explains that ImMucin is not a replacement for traditional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or radiation. Rather, the company is targeting a different stage in the patient’s battle against cancer, specifically the early stages of the detection, as well as during remission. That’s why, unfortunately, the drug won’t be helpful to many cancer patients – specifically those who are in advanced stages of the disease – because it requires a relatively healthy body to be fully effective.

Even though ImMucin is a vaccine, it is given to people who are already sick, unlike traditional vaccines. So, while ImMucin’s scientific mechanism is one of a vaccine, from the point of view of the patient, it acts exactly like a drug that has physiological effects when introduced to the body.

“Many preventative cancer vaccines today are not actual vaccines against cancer,” Levy says. “Young women can take a vaccine for the HPV virus, which doesn’t combat cancer; it’s a vaccine against a virus that has been proven to lead to a more serious cervical cancer.”

Training the immune system to attack cancerous cells

ImMucin works by stimulating a part of the immune system and teaching it to attack certain cells with certain markers that indicate the presence of cancer. When the drug is introduced during an early stage of cancer, the hope is that as a patient’s cancer begins to creep back, the immune system is trained appropriately to know which cells to destroy and which to leave be.

This immune response has been consistent throughout Vaxil’s clinical trials on the vaccine over the past few years. The company ran trials exclusively on Multiple Myeloma patients until January 2014, when it began trials on breast cancer patients.

Vaxil’s current switch from successful myeloma trials to breast cancer trials would certainly turn some heads in the biotech community. That’s because typically, when a drug has this much success on a certain type of cancer, a company would provide more resources to finish the trials (through Phase III) and get it to market – it wouldn’t delve into new projects.

Vaxil’s most recent valuation is just under $3 million. In the US, clinical trials and ongoing research and development can cost hundreds of millions of dollars per drug, and it’s very possible that Vaxil doesn’t have the cash to push ImMucin to the market at this point. However, Levy is confident that ImMucin will be on the market by the end of this decade.

Vaxil BioTheraputics has promising technology and initial clinical success, especially since ImMucin has the potential to treat 90 percent of cancers found in patients. Certainly, this kind of immunotherapy for an illness previously thought of as incurable, gives hope to millions of patients and their families.

Jonathan Neff,

February 24, 2016

Erase Herpes FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!

Very informative video (link) about the medical progression made to eliminate herpes in 3-4 weeks presented by Dr. Christine Buehler

Click here to watch the video

Scientists Develop Protein That Blocks Both Strains of HIV


Arguably the most exciting news from the world of HIV science since PrEP and treatment as prevention (TasP), is that scientists at The Scripps Research Institute in Florida have developed a protein so powerful it blocks against every strain of HIV-1 and HIV-2, even the meanest ones.

The discovery stems from what has increasingly become part of the HIV vernacular most associated with hope: CCR5. HIV can’t get in and hijack CD4 cells without help from the CCR5 receptor. In recent years, particularly since Timothy Ray Brown (aka “The Berlin Patient”) became the only person on earth ever cured of HIV, gene therapies focusing on the CCR5 receptor have begun to show great promise.

The new protein created by Scripps, eCD4-lg has demonstrated such potency it may even work as an unconventional vaccine. The anti-HIV agent, dubbed eCD4-lg, is “fused to a sulfopeptide mimicking CCR5,” the editors of the scientific report published this week in Nature explain. The protein “avidly binds the Env protein of HIV-1 and irreversibly inactivates it.”

In other words, HIV becomes locked out.

The research was published a year ago. The Scripps team led by Michael Farzan recently received $6 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to keep their work going. “Farzan brings an innovative approach to combating HIV,” the website R&D reported. “The approach works by coaxing muscle cells into producing inhibitor proteins that block key sites on the virus’s surface used to attach and invade human immune cells—fooling the virus into thinking it is binding to a human cell. Unable to attach to cells, and unable to reproduce, the virus simply floats impotently in the blood stream.”

In a news release by Scripps last year, Farzan said, “Our compound is the broadest and most potent entry inhibitor described so far. Unlike antibodies, which fail to neutralize a large fraction of HIV-1 strains, our protein has been effective against all strains tested, raising the possibility it could offer an effective HIV vaccine alternative.”

Progress on an HIV vaccine using broadly neutralizing antibodies, or BnABs, has been slow and only has produced modest results in monkeys. Gene therapy approaches that focus on the CCr5 receptor have tended to lead to more exciting headlines.

Related HIV Equal News: Gene Therapy Could Revolutionize HIV Treatment

One company already pursuing a gene therapy treatment in clinical trials for people already infected with HIV is Calimmune Inc.

“By reducing CCR5 expression and preventing HIV viral fusion, Cal-1 may protect the treated cells against HIV and has the potential to provide a continuous means of controlling HIV after a single treatment,” Calimmune announced in a news release last May after a very small trial where four volunteers were infused with their own blood stem cells.

The approach was shown to be effective in a test tube prior to clinical trials. Whether Cal-1 has proven effective in human clinical trials has yet to be announced. The therapy still is being assessed primarily for safety. A company spokesman told John Farrell, a writer for Forbes, that results may be disclosed prior to the conclusion of the trial in September. Farrell called Calimmune a company “definitely a company to keep an eye on in 2016.”

Strategies targeting CCR5 in immune therapy have flourished after Timothy Ray Brown, also known as “The Berlin Patient,” became the first person on earth ever to be functionally cured of HIV. Brown had acute myeloid leukemia as well as HIV. His leukemia was cured after receiving an allogenic stem cell transplant from a donor with a CCR5 delta 32 mutation. People who are homozygous (meaning the same two alleles on a gene) for CCR5 delta 32 are resistant to HIV.

Science Behind Vagus Nerve Stimulation

The Vagus nerve is a nerve that originates in the brain. NERVANA electronically signals the Vagus nerve which in turn stimulates the release of neurotransmitters in the brain that enhance mood.